Changes between Version 10 and Version 11 of YumBenchmarks

Show
Ignore:
Author:
james (IP: 65.172.155.230)
Timestamp:
09/29/10 16:18:42 (7 years ago)
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • YumBenchmarks

    v10 v11  
    265265For a long time yum had been "much worse" than rpm for install/remove commands. Some of that was due to general fixes, but it also generally has got less love because any difference in speed was only really noticeable with small numbers of small packages (otherwise the I/O from the install/remove vastly outweighs any other part of the operation). 
    266266 
    267 It is also worth noting that recent versions of yum also have to do a non-trivial amount more work than plain rpm, as yum keeps a detailed history log and it's own yumdb, so yum should never as fast as rpm ... but we can (and do) endevour to get close. 
     267It is also worth noting that yum has to do a non-trivial amount more work than plain rpm, as yum keeps a detailed history log and it's own yumdb, so yum should never be as fast as rpm but we can (and do) endevour to get close. 
    268268 
    269269These timings were performed on a virt-machine: 
    270270 
    271 ||command||version||operation||time (seconds)|| 
     271||'''command'''||'''version'''||'''operation'''||'''time''' (seconds)|| 
    272272 
    273273